Evaluation

__Evaluation__
The following rubric will be used to evaluate your task:

are built correctly || All 3 truth tables are correct || Two of the truth tables are correct || One of the truth tables is correct || None of the truth tables are correct || helped you arrive at your conclusion || Explanations for all 3 truth tables are valid || Explanations for two of the truth tables are valid || Explanation for one of the truth tables is valid || None are the explanations are valid or they don't exist || 3 tables were defined || The propositions for two tables were defined || The propositions for only one table were defined || None of the propositions were defined for any of the tables. || contained the results of the three encounters and was clear and easy to read || The final document contained the results of only 2 encounters and was clear and easy to read || The final document contained the results of one encounter || You did not have a final document with any results (0 points) || mistakes in your report || There were one or two spelling/grammar mistakes || There are several spelling/grammar mistakes || There are many spelling/grammar mistakes or you did not use a word processor to create your report ||
 * **Category** || **Excellent - 4 points** || **Good - 3 points** || **Fair - 2 points** || **Poor - 1 point** ||
 * The truth tables
 * Explanation of how the truth table
 * The atomic propositions for each table were defined || The propositions for all
 * Presentation of the final document || The final document
 * Spelling and Grammar || There were no spelling /grammar